diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
index 91c958b..00455c1 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.aux
@@ -61,85 +61,4 @@
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }}{26}{figure.caption.12}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:linear_model_sample_comparison}{{7}{26}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model samples.\relax }{figure.caption.12}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }}{27}{figure.caption.13}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:linear_model_samples_comparison}{{8}{27}{Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }{figure.caption.13}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{28}{figure.caption.14}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{9}{28}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.14}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.2}Non-Linear Model}{29}{subsubsection.6.2.2}\protected@file@percent }
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }}{29}{table.caption.15}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_architecture}{{5}{29}{Non-linear Quantile Regression Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.15}{}}
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{30}{table.caption.16}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:non_linear_model_results}{{6}{30}{Non-linear quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.16}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }}{31}{figure.caption.17}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:non_linear_model_examples}{{10}{31}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.17}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{32}{figure.caption.18}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:non-linear_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{11}{32}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive non-linear models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.18}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.3}GRU Model}{32}{subsubsection.6.2.3}\protected@file@percent }
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces GRU Model Architecture\relax }}{33}{table.caption.19}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:gru_model_architecture}{{7}{33}{GRU Model Architecture\relax }{table.caption.19}{}}
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }}{34}{table.caption.20}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:autoregressive_gru_model_results}{{8}{34}{Autoregressive GRU quantile regression model results. All the models used a dropout of 0.2 .\relax }{table.caption.20}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }}{35}{figure.caption.21}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:gru_model_sample_comparison}{{12}{35}{Comparison of the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU model examples.\relax }{figure.caption.21}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }}{36}{figure.caption.22}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:gru_model_quantile_over_underestimation}{{13}{36}{Over/underestimation of the quantiles for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive GRU models. Both the quantile performance for the training and test set are shown. The plots are generated using the input features NRV, Load, Wind, PV, Net Position, and the quarter embedding (only for the autoregressive model).\relax }{figure.caption.22}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Diffusion}{36}{subsection.6.3}\protected@file@percent }
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }}{38}{figure.caption.23}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:diffusion_intermediates}{{14}{38}{Intermediate steps of the diffusion model for example 864 from the test set. The confidence intervals shown in the plots are made using 100 samples.\relax }{figure.caption.23}{}}
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces Simple diffusion model results.\relax }}{38}{table.caption.24}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:diffusion_results}{{9}{38}{Simple diffusion model results.\relax }{table.caption.24}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.4}Comparison}{39}{subsection.6.4}\protected@file@percent }
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{40}{1}{39}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{40}{1}{39}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{40}{1}{39}
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }}{40}{table.caption.25}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:model_comparison}{{10}{40}{Comparison of the different models using the \ac {MSE}, \ac {MAE} and \ac {CRPS} metrics. The best-performing models for a certain type are selected based on the \ac {CRPS}.\relax }{table.caption.25}{}}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NAQR}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{CRPS}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MSE}{41}{1}{40}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{MAE}{41}{1}{40}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }}{41}{figure.caption.26}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:ar_linear_gru_comparison}{{15}{41}{Comparison of the autoregressive linear and GRU model\relax }{figure.caption.26}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Policies for battery optimization}{42}{section.7}\protected@file@percent }
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Baselines}{42}{subsection.7.1}\protected@file@percent }
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{43}{1}{42}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{43}{1}{42}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\ACRO{recordpage}{NRV}{44}{1}{43}
-\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }}{43}{table.caption.27}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{tab:fixed_thresholds}{{11}{43}{Results of the baseline policies on the test set. \relax }{table.caption.27}{}}
-\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.2}Policy using generated NRV samples}{43}{subsection.7.2}\protected@file@percent }
-\ACRO{total-barriers}{1}
-\abx@aux@page{6}{45}
-\abx@aux@page{7}{45}
-\abx@aux@page{8}{45}
-\abx@aux@page{9}{45}
-\ACRO{usage}{QR=={0}}
-\ACRO{usage}{AQR=={0}}
-\ACRO{usage}{NAQR=={1}}
-\ACRO{usage}{MSE=={4}}
-\ACRO{usage}{MAE=={4}}
-\ACRO{usage}{CRPS=={2}}
-\ACRO{usage}{NRV=={9}}
-\ACRO{usage}{PV=={0}}
-\ACRO{usage}{NP=={0}}
-\ACRO{pages}{NAQR=={41@1@40}}
-\ACRO{pages}{CRPS=={40@1@39|41@1@40}}
-\ACRO{pages}{MSE=={40@1@39|41@1@40}}
-\ACRO{pages}{MAE=={40@1@39|41@1@40}}
-\ACRO{pages}{NRV=={43@1@42|44@1@43}}
-\abx@aux@read@bbl@mdfivesum{5DC935CC8C8FAB8A3CAF97A486ED2386}
-\abx@aux@read@bblrerun
-\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{dumas_deep_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
-\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{lu_scenarios_2022}{nyt/global//global/global}
-\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{poggi_electricity_2023}{nyt/global//global/global}
-\abx@aux@defaultrefcontext{0}{weron_electricity_2014}{nyt/global//global/global}
-\gdef \@abspage@last{46}
+\newlabel{fig:linear_model_samples_comparison}{{8}{27}{Samples for two examples from the test set for the autoregressive and non-autoregressive linear model. The real NRV is shown in orange.\relax }{figur
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
index d5d38dd..f32af90 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.bcf
@@ -2818,70 +2818,4 @@
article
report
- author
- title
-
-
-
-
-
-
- ./references.bib
-
-
- weron_electricity_2014
- poggi_electricity_2023
- lu_scenarios_2022
- dumas_deep_2022
- rasul_autoregressive_2021
- dumas_deep_2022
-
-
-
-
- presort
-
-
- sortkey
-
-
- sortname
- author
- editor
- translator
- sorttitle
- title
-
-
- sortyear
- year
-
-
- sorttitle
- title
-
-
- volume
- 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
index 953f243..08304a5 100644
--- a/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
+++ b/Reports/Thesis/verslag.log
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2023.9.17) 11 MAY 2024 02:09
+This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.25 (TeX Live 2023) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2023.9.17) 11 MAY 2024 02:10
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
file:line:error style messages enabled.
@@ -1557,248 +1557,4 @@ Package pdftex.def Info: images/quantile_regression/quantile_performance/AQR_Qua
File: images/quantile_regression/quantile_performance/AQR_Quantile_Performance_Test.jpeg Graphic file (type jpg)